Food Hygiene Report 2026 | UK Ratings | Towns, Cities & Regions
hero-image-food-hygiene-report-2026

Food Hygiene: Know the Score 2026 report

How have the UK's Food Hygiene ratings changed over the last 5 years?

What are food hygiene ratings and how does your area perform?

We are High Speed Training, one of the UK’s leading providers of food hygiene courses. We’ve certified over 4 million learners since 2008, including hundreds of thousands of learners and businesses across the world on the vital topic of food hygiene.

In the UK, food businesses are awarded a food hygiene rating as part of the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS). Ratings range from 0, indicating that urgent improvement is necessary, to 5, indicating that hygiene standards are very good. These ratings act as a trust signal for customers, allowing them to make informed decisions when it comes to choosing where to eat and drink.

For businesses themselves, food hygiene ratings allow them to showcase their high standards of hygiene to customers. Staff training courses, such as our Food Safety & Hygiene Level 2 Course for Catering, are vital for establishing and maintaining good hygiene practices. For managers and supervisors, a Level 3 Food Hygiene Course in Catering provides knowledge of good food hygiene practices and their legal responsibilities.

High Speed Training has investigated Food Standards Agency (FSA) data for over 239,562 food businesses across England, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales for the last 5 years and has created reports on this data since 2022.

This year’s report will highlight the regions that are currently performing strongly, as well as investigating trends over the last 5 years to explore how the food hygiene landscape is evolving.

The Results

By using the interactive map and table below, you can see how your region, town or city ranks against the rest of the country.

Loading ...
Back
South West
East Counties
London
Wales
South East
North West
North East
West Midlands
East Midlands
Northern Ireland
Scotland
Yorkshire & Humber

Overall results

Filter these results by Region or by Town / City:

North East

Ranked #2 of 11

Yorkshire and Humberside

Ranked #6 of 11

South West

Ranked #1 of 11

Wales

Ranked #7 of 11

East Counties

Ranked joint #5 of 11

East Midlands

Ranked #4 of 11

London

Ranked #10 of 11 (bottom)

North West

Ranked #8 of 11

Northern Ireland

Ranked #3 of 11

Scotland

Scotland uses a different rating system to the rest of the UK which has two main ratings - 'Pass' or 'Improvement Required'. We have provided the percentage pass rates by local authority below.

South East

Ranked joint #5 of 11

West Midlands

Ranked #9 of 11

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme

The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme (FHRS) operates across England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Working in partnership with local authorities, it provides information to the public about the hygiene standards of food businesses.

The FHRS was formally launched in November 2010, and was designed to provide clear information to consumers about the hygiene standards of a business. Prior to this, there was not a standardised rating scheme across the country, meaning ratings and hygiene information were not easily accessible to the general public.

Research from the FSA found that consumers view rating stickers as a source of trustworthy, independent information about the food hygiene standards of a business. Many use the scheme to check ratings and avoid lower-rated businesses in order to reduce the risk of foodborne illness.

Each food business will have an inspection, typically conducted by Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) from a local authority. The frequency of these visits depends on the nature of a business and its level of risk. For example, a business that handles and serves raw fish would be considered high risk and therefore inspected more regularly. During an inspection an EHO will assess whether the correct safety standards are being maintained to keep members of staff, the public and customers safe.

When inspecting a premises an EHO will use the FSA's Food Law Code of Practice to assess a business in three key categories. The scores from each category are then used to calculate an overall rating.

What makes up a rating?

During an inspection an EHO will score a business in the following three categories:

Food Safety and Hygiene Procedures

How hygienically the food is handled and how it is prepared, cooked, re-heated, cooled and stored.

Structural Requirements

The physical condition of a premises, including cleanliness, layout, lighting, ventilation, pest control and other facilities.

Confidence in Management

How a business manages ways of keeping food safe, looking at processes, training and systems to ensure good hygiene is maintained.

Each category is scored individually and then added together to calculate the intervention score. This score is then mapped to the food hygiene rating score and determines the overall rating that a business will attain. A business needs the lowest intervention score possible in order to achieve the highest food hygiene rating.

Food hygiene ratings are scored out of 5 as follows:

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 = Urgent Improvement Needed

0 1 2 3 4 5

1 = Major Improvement Needed

0 1 2 3 4 5

2 = Some Improvement Needed

0 1 2 3 4 5

3 = Satisfactory

0 1 2 3 4 5

4 = Good

0 1 2 3 4 5

5 = Very Good

After an inspection, the ratings are made available on the FSA's website. Businesses are also given window stickers which display their rating, and they are encouraged to share them online. In England, displaying a window sticker is considered best practice but is not currently a legal requirement. This is different in Wales and Northern Ireland, where this sticker must legally be prominently displayed.

2022-2026: What has changed?

2026 marks 5 continuous years of High Speed Training’s Annual Food hygiene report. Over this time, we have analysed over 1 million business ratings across England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland.

With this data, we are able to analyse trends over half a decade, seeing which regions have performed consistently over this time, as well as which areas have seen the largest rise and fall in both ratings and in rankings.

Since 2022, we have seen a positive trend in the average food hygiene rating across England, Northern Ireland and Wales, rising from 4.49 in 2022 to 4.58 in 2026. The average rating rose each year, apart from 2025, when it fell slightly to 4.47.

Average food hygiene rating across England, Wales and NI, 2022 - 2026
Line chart showing the average food hygiene rating across England, Wales and NI rising from 4.49 in 2022 to 4.58 in 2026, dipping to 4.47 in 2025 Table of average ratings: 2022 4.49, 2023 4.51, 2024 4.52, 2025 4.47, 2026 4.58

We saw a similar theme across individual regions, with all but one of the analysed regions improving their rating from 2022 to 2026. The West Midlands and the North East shared the biggest increase in average rating, with both regions recording a rise of 0.10 between 2022 and 2026.

All but one region increased their rating from 2022 - 2026, with the average rating increasing from 4.49 to 4.58

The West Midlands and the North East shared the biggest increase in average rating, with a rise of 0.10. Their average ratings in 2022 were 4.37 and 4.56 respectively

The only region to record a drop in average rating over the 5-year period was Northern Ireland, dropping by 0.04, though it is worth noting that Northern Ireland has been a strong performer in the context of all the regions analysed, taking the top region spot twice and never dropping out of the top 3 since 2022.

Average rating by Region, 2022 Vs 2026
Table of average ratings by region for 2022 and 2026 Bar chart comparing each region's average food hygiene rating in 2022 and 2026, with all regions except Northern Ireland improving

Here, you can see a heatmap of all of the analysed regions across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, showing their position in the national rankings for each year from 2022 to 2026.

Annual National ranking of each region by average food hygiene rating
Heatmap of each region's national ranking from 2022 to 2026. South West ranks 1st in 2024, 2025 and 2026; Northern Ireland slips from 1st to 3rd; London ranks lowest

There is a high level of consistency across the rankings, with most regions ranking broadly the same across the analysed period. The region that showed the biggest improvement in terms of ranking was the North East, which has improved year on year, rising from 5th in 2022 to 2nd in 2026

Northern Ireland recorded the biggest drop in rankings performance, losing the top spot it held in both 2022 and 2023, slipping to 3rd in 2026. In terms of overall ranking position, the South West performed best over the 5 years, never dropping below second place and ranking top in 2024, 2025 and 2026.

Scotland

Over the last 5 years, Scotland's average pass rate has broadly increased, with a notable spike in 2024. In 2022, the average pass rate across all local authorities was 91.8%, rising to the high of 92.5% in 2024. The average has stabilised in the last two years, showing a slight decrease from 2025 to 2026 at 92.16%, but an overall increase over the 5 year period.

Scotland's average pass rate, 2022 - 2026
Line chart of Scotland's average pass rate rising from 91.8% in 2022 to a peak of 92.5% in 2024, settling at 92.16% in 2026 2022 91.8% 2023 92.13% 2024 92.5% 2025 92.22% 2026 92.16% Scotland's Average Pass rate

Scotland's Food Hygiene Information Scheme

In Scotland, a similar scheme called the Food Hygiene Information Scheme (FHIS), evaluates businesses on their food hygiene practices. After an EHO has reviewed the safety systems, observed food hygiene in practice and spoken with the staff, businesses are given either:

Scotland Scheme Pass Image

Pass - The business meets the legal standard of food hygiene.

or

Scotland Scheme Improve Image

Improvement Required - The legal standard of food hygiene was not evident during the inspection. The business will need to improve certain areas to then qualify for a pass.

As in England, the FHIS is available to view online, though it is not required by law for a business to display their rating.

Key Findings

Top Towns and Cities

1
Southport and Ipswich
4.92
2
Chichester
4.91
3
Stockton-on-Tees
4.86

Top regions

1
South West
4.69
2
North East
4.66
3
Northern Ireland
4.65

Top large cities (over 1,000 establishments)

1
Nottingham
4.73
2
Brighton and Hove
4.72
3
Blackpool
4.61

19.5% of takeaways in England, Wales and Northern Ireland had a food hygiene rating of 3 or below

9 out of 11 regions in the UK improved their average food hygiene score from 2025 with the other 2 maintaining their score

501 food establishments in England, Wales and Northern Ireland scored a zero for their food hygiene rating

72.33% of food establishments in the UK scored a 5 on their FH rating, with 88.31% scoring 4 and above, a higher percentage than in 2025

Average rating across England, Northern Ireland and Wales increased by 0.11 to 4.58 from 4.47 in 2025

The average pass rate across all local authorities in Scotland was 92.16%, a slight decrease from 92.22% in 2025

Regional findings

We have compiled a list of key facts for each region of England, along with Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Select a region from the options to get specific findings for where you live.

East Counties

5th In regional rankings
4.61 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.61 - 2025: 4.60
Show details
  • Ipswich, ranked 1st in East Counties, has the highest rating of 4.92 - an increase of 0.03 from 2025.
  • Luton, ranked 14th in East Counties, has the lowest rating of 4.29 - a decrease of 0.05 from 2025.
  • Watford (4.64) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 5 positions from its 2025 rank of 11th.
  • Ranked 6th in East Counties, Watford (4.64) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.15. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.49.
  • Harlow (4.57), ranked 8th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 4 positions from its 2025 rank of 4th.
  • Harlow (4.57), ranked 8th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.14. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.71.
  • Across the region, there were 19,090 premises analysed. This is an increase of 294 from 2025.
  • 14.96% of takeaways and sandwich shops in East Counties scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 22 premises scored a 0.
  • Across East Counties, 203 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 1,830.
  • 90.41% of all premises in East Counties scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 91.82% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

East Midlands

4th In regional rankings
4.64 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.64 - 2025: 4.63
Show details
  • Lincoln, ranked 1st in the East Midlands, has the highest rating of 4.85 - a decrease of 0.04 from 2025.
  • Lincoln (4.85) and Nottingham (4.73) maintained their positions in the rankings from 2025.
  • Lincoln (4.85), ranked 1st in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.04. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.89.
  • Northampton, ranked 5th in the East Midlands, has the lowest rating of 4.38 - an increase of 0.04 from 2025.
  • Chesterfield (4.73), Leicester (4.51), Derby (4.46) and Northampton (4.38) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 2 positions from their 2025 ranks of 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th respectively.
  • Ranked 2nd in the East Midlands, Chesterfield (4.73) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.10. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.63.
  • Across the region, there were 16,107 premises analysed. This is an increase of 201 from 2025.
  • 16.57% of takeaways and sandwich shops in the East Midlands scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 34 premises scored a 0.
  • Across the East Midlands, 182 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 1,566.
  • 90.28% of all premises in the East Midlands scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 92.22% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

London

10th In regional rankings
4.39 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.39 - 2025: 4.38
Show details
  • Kensington and Chelsea, ranked 1st in London, has the highest rating of 4.81 - an increase of 0.02 from 2025.
  • Ealing, ranked 30th in London, has the lowest rating of 3.91 - a decrease of 0.02 from 2025.
  • Bromley (4.64) and Lewisham (4.32) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 2 positions from their 2025 ranks of 6th and 21st respectively.
  • Ranked 19th in London, Lewisham (4.32) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.19. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.13.
  • Hillingdon (4.12), ranked 26th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 9 positions from its 2025 rank of 17th.
  • Hillingdon (4.12), ranked 26th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.12. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.24.
  • Across the region, there were 36,804 premises analysed. This is an increase of 421 from 2025.
  • 22.31% of takeaways and sandwich shops in London scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 192 premises scored a 0.
  • Across London, 823 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 6,014.
  • 83.66% of all premises in London scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 84.34% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

Yorkshire and Humberside

6th In regional rankings
4.58 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.58 - 2025: 4.58
Show details
  • Ripon, ranked 1st in Yorkshire and Humberside, has the highest rating of 4.82 - an increase of 0.17 from 2025.
  • Ranked 1st in Yorkshire and Humberside, Ripon (4.82) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.17. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.65.
  • Bradford, ranked 15th in Yorkshire and Humberside, has the lowest rating of 4.35 - a decrease of 0.01 from 2025.
  • Sheffield (4.63) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 4 positions from its 2025 rank of 8th.
  • Grimsby (4.55), ranked 8th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 5 positions from its 2025 rank of 3rd.
  • Grimsby (4.55), ranked 8th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.10. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.65.
  • Across the region, there were 21,433 premises analysed. This is an increase of 335 from 2025.
  • 18.41% of takeaways and sandwich shops in Yorkshire and Humberside scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 30 premises scored a 0.
  • Across Yorkshire and Humberside, 302 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 2,245.
  • 89.53% of all premises in Yorkshire and Humberside scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 90.88% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

West Midlands

9th In regional rankings
4.47 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.47 - 2025: 4.45
Show details
  • Shrewsbury (4.74) & Telford (4.74) took top spot, sharing the highest rating of 4.74 - an increase of 0.14 and 0.08 from 2025 respectively.
  • Walsall, ranked 15th in the West Midlands, has the lowest rating of 4.03 - a decrease of 0.09 from 2025.
  • Lichfield (4.67) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 9 positions from its 2025 rank of 12th.
  • Ranked 3rd in the West Midlands, Lichfield (4.67) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.18. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.49.
  • Burton upon Trent (4.39), ranked 12th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 10 positions from its 2025 rank of 2nd.
  • Burton upon Trent (4.39), ranked 12th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.30. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.69.
  • Across the region, there were 18,181 premises analysed. This is an increase of 99 from 2025.
  • 23.40% of takeaways and sandwich shops in the West Midlands scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 66 premises scored a 0.
  • Across the West Midlands, 397 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 2,602.
  • 85.69% of all premises in the West Midlands scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 86.98% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

North East

2nd In regional rankings
4.66 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.66 - 2025: 4.64
Show details
  • Stockton-on-Tees, ranked 1st in the North East, has the highest rating of 4.86 - a decrease of 0.03 from 2025.
  • Stockton-on-Tees (4.86), Hartlepool (4.84), Darlington (4.80) and Sunderland (4.68) all maintained their regional ranks of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th respectively.
  • Stockton-on-Tees (4.86), whilst ranked 1st in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.03. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.89.
  • South Shields, ranked 9th in the North East, has the lowest rating of 4.46 - a decrease of 0.01 from 2025.
  • South Shields (4.46), ranked 9th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 3 positions from its 2025 rank of 6th.
  • Ranked 4th in the North East, Sunderland (4.68) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.05. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.63.
  • Across the region, there were 9,748 premises analysed. This is an increase of 81 from 2025.
  • 17.73% of takeaways and sandwich shops in the North East scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 9 premises scored a 0.
  • Across the North East, 85 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 843.
  • 91.35% of all premises in the North East scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 93.31% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

North West

8th In regional rankings
4.48 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.48 - 2025: 4.48
Show details
  • Southport, ranked 1st in the North West, has the highest rating of 4.92 - a decrease of 0.03 from 2025.
  • Bolton, ranked 20th in the North West, has the lowest rating of 4.03 - a decrease of 0.05 from 2025.
  • Burnley (4.46) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 7 positions from its 2025 rank of 15th.
  • Ranked 8th in the North West, Burnley (4.46) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.16. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.30.
  • Bury (4.25), ranked 18th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 9 positions from its 2025 rank of 9th.
  • Bury (4.25), ranked 18th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.15. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.40.
  • Across the region, there were 27,070 premises analysed. This is a decrease of 416 from 2025.
  • 24.30% of takeaways and sandwich shops in the North West scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 70 premises scored a 0.
  • Across the North West, 509 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 3,765.
  • 86.09% of all premises in the North West scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 88.14% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

South East

5th In regional rankings
4.61 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.61 - 2025: 4.60
Show details
  • Chichester, ranked 1st in the South East, has the highest rating of 4.91 - an increase of 0.10 from 2025.
  • Portsmouth, ranked 15th in the South East, has the lowest rating of 4.26 - a decrease of 0.18 from 2025.
  • Portsmouth (4.26), ranked 15th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.18. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.44.
  • Slough (4.44) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 7 positions from its 2025 rank of 19th.
  • Gillingham (4.60), ranked 8th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 2 positions from its 2025 rank of 6th.
  • Ranked 6th in the South East, Worthing (4.65) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.11. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.54.
  • Across the region, there were 29,279 premises analysed. This is an increase of 248 from 2025.
  • 16.99% of takeaways and sandwich shops in the South East scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 32 premises scored a 0.
  • Across the South East, 344 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 2,864.
  • 90.22% of all premises in the South East scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 91.40% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

South West

1st In regional rankings
4.69 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.69 - 2025: 4.67
Show details
  • Poole, ranked 1st in the South West, has the highest rating of 4.83 - an increase of 0.03 from 2025.
  • Bath, ranked 11th in the South West, has the lowest rating of 4.44 - an increase of 0.11 from 2025.
  • Salisbury (4.66) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 4 positions from its 2025 rank of 10th.
  • Ranked 6th in the South West, Salisbury (4.66) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.19. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.47.
  • Wells (4.66), ranked 6th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 5 positions from its 2025 rank of 1st.
  • Wells (4.66), ranked 6th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.16. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.82.
  • Across the region, there were 21,038 premises analysed. This is an increase of 132 from 2025.
  • 12.88% of takeaways and sandwich shops in the South West scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 31 premises scored a 0.
  • Across the South West, 239 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 1,597.
  • 92.41% of all premises in the South West scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 93.50% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

Wales

7th In regional rankings
4.51 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.51 - 2025: 4.47
Show details
  • Wrexham, ranked 1st in Wales, has the highest rating of 4.94 - an increase of 0.04 from 2025.
  • Blaenau Gwent, ranked 22nd in Wales, has the lowest rating of 3.96 - an increase of 0.02 from 2025.
  • Newport (4.61), Bridgend (4.51) and Torfaen (4.45) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 1 position from their 2025 ranks of 8th, 12th and 14th respectively.
  • Ceredigion (4.39), ranked 16th, had the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 7 positions from its 2025 rank of 9th.
  • Ceredigion (4.39), ranked 16th in the region, had the biggest decrease in average rating with a drop of 0.10. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.49.
  • Ranked 18th in Wales, Rhondda Cynon Taf (4.32) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.11. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.21.
  • Across the region, there were 13,035 premises analysed. This is an increase of 12 from 2025.
  • 22.09% of takeaways and sandwich shops in Wales scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 15 premises scored a 0.
  • Across Wales, 186 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 1,641.
  • 87.41% of all premises in Wales scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 88.76% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

Northern Ireland

3rd In regional rankings
4.65 average score
  • Overall region change:
  • 2026: 4.65 - 2025: 4.64
Show details
  • Mid and East Antrim, ranked 1st in Northern Ireland, has the highest rating of 4.82 - an increase of 0.05 from 2025.
  • Mid and East Antrim (4.82) had the biggest ranking improvement across the region, moving up 2 positions from its 2025 rank of 3rd.
  • Ranked 1st in Northern Ireland, Mid and East Antrim (4.82) had the biggest improvement in average rating with an increase of 0.05. Its average rating in 2025 was 4.77.
  • Belfast City, ranked 9th in Northern Ireland, has the lowest rating of 4.47 - an increase of 0.01 from 2025.
  • Lisburn and Castlereagh City (4.81) and Mid Ulster (4.76) shared the biggest drop in ranking, moving down 1 position from their 2025 ranks of 1st and 2nd respectively.
  • Mid Ulster (4.76) and Antrim and Newtownabbey (4.66) shared the biggest decrease in average rating, with a drop of 0.02. Their average ratings in 2025 were 4.78 and 4.68 respectively.
  • Across the region, there were 6,434 premises analysed. This is a decrease of 10 from 2025.
  • 16.64% of takeaways and sandwich shops in Northern Ireland scored a 0, 1, 2, or 3.
  • Across the region, 0 premises scored a 0.
  • Across Northern Ireland, 39 premises scored a 1.
  • The total number of premises scoring a 0, 1, 2, or 3 was 536.
  • 91.67% of all premises in Northern Ireland scored a 4 or a 5.
  • 93.23% of restaurants, cafes, and canteens in the region scored a 4 or a 5.
Show details

Scotland

N/A In regional rankings
92.16% average pass rate

In Scotland, businesses are assessed by an EHO and receive a ‘Pass’, or an ‘Improvement required’ notice. The below stats are the percentage of businesses that received a ‘Pass’.

  • Overall country change:
  • 2026: 92.16% - 2025: 92.22%
Show details
  • Ranked 1st in Scotland, South Ayrshire has the highest pass rate of 98.78%, although this was a decrease of -0.22% from 2025.
  • Highland, ranked 32nd, has the lowest pass rate in the country at 78.26%, which was a slight improvement of +0.38% from the previous year.
  • Perth and Kinross, which is now ranked 9th, had the biggest improvement in ranking, moving up 7 positions from its 2025 rank of 16th.
  • The biggest drop in ranking was experienced by Orkney Islands, which fell 12 places from 6th in 2025 to 18th.
  • The most significant improvement in pass rate was seen in Perth and Kinross, which improved by +2.71% to achieve a pass rate of 96.06%.
  • Orkney Islands also saw the biggest decrease in its pass rate, which fell by -3.44% to 92.81%.
  • Glasgow City is ranked 25th with a pass rate of 88.20%, a decrease of -0.27% from 2025.
  • Edinburgh (City of) is ranked 27th with a pass rate of 87.42%, representing a decrease of -2.26% from the previous year.
Show details

Food Hygiene resource pack

To support food businesses across the UK to attain and maintain the highest rating and standards of food hygiene, High Speed Training has developed a free Food Hygiene Rating Scheme Resource Pack.

Developed in partnership with EHOs, this pack includes detailed information on the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme scoring system, guidance on what a visiting EHO will be looking out for, and highlights common areas where food operators encounter issues. The pack also contains more than 20 free downloadable resources, including posters and checklists to help you ace your next inspection.

Consumers: What you need to know

Your role in food safety

While it's a legal duty for food businesses to operate hygienically, customers are still encouraged to look before they book. Checking these ratings to ensure that the premises are maintaining good standards of hygiene falls to you. Fortunately, checking ratings is straightforward; you can easily check online via the Food Standards Agency (FSA) website, and some businesses display their rating in-store.

However, in England, businesses are not legally required to display ratings, unlike Northern Ireland and Wales. The FSA’s 2025 audit found that 30% of establishments in England chose not to display their rating, increasing from 28% in 2024. This contrasts sharply with Northern Ireland and Wales, where the amount of businesses choosing to not display their ratings was 8% and 5% respectively.

Notably, businesses in England with a rating of 5 were more likely to display their sticker in a location visible from outside the premises (75%) compared to those rated 4 and below. The data also showed that the majority of low-rated businesses appeared to display a rating from the previous or an earlier inspection, rather than the most recent inspection. This highlights why your active participation is crucial. If a rating isn't clearly shown or doesn’t seem up to date, always check online.

Keeping yourself safe from food poisoning

Food poisoning can lead to serious illness. This can happen if food is not cooked or reheated thoroughly, is stored incorrectly, or left out for too long. It can also occur if food for consumption is handled by someone who is ill or has not washed their hands, or if food is eaten after its “use by” date.

Government data shows that there has been an increasing trend in the number of confirmed laboratory reports for Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella serovars from 2023 to the first quarter of 2025. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) reported that Salmonella serovars cases increased to 10,406, the highest figure in a decade, alongside 69,394 Campylobacter spp. cases.

These figures emphasise the importance of checking food hygiene ratings as by doing so you are taking a powerful step to safeguard your health.

Only one-third of the rating is based on the hygienic handling of food

When you see a food hygiene rating, it's helpful to know that it is based on three equally weighted components: hygienic food handling, the cleanliness and condition of facilities, and food safety management.

This comprehensive approach means a lower rating doesn't always indicate unhygienic food preparation. For instance, issues like peeling paint could impact a score, even if food handling is excellent. That's why we strongly encourage a quick deep dive on the Food Standards Agency (FSA) website for a detailed breakdown of an establishment's rating. This transparency allows you to understand the full picture and make informed decisions.

Your power to choose

The call for mandatory display of food hygiene ratings in England continues to gain momentum. Your active participation in using these ratings and choosing businesses with high standards sends the clear message that food hygiene matters to you.

The FSA’s 2025 audit found that the most common reason for businesses to have a neutral or negative perspective on mandatory display was the belief that customers do not pay attention to ratings.

With the increasing cost of living, customers are eating out less and less, so are often placing more emphasis on quality. Whether you’re making a choice to eat out or ordering a takeaway, ensure that you are an informed consumer and look before you book.

A quick check of a business's rating on the FSA website empowers you to make safer choices and support businesses that consistently prioritise excellent hygiene, whilst protecting yourself from the health costs of a bad meal, not just the wasted money.

The business case for food hygiene

Consumer trust

With food hygiene ratings having a significant impact on customer decisions, taking food hygiene seriously isn’t just about ticking boxes to meet compliance standards, it’s a key driver of customer trust and long-term business success. The FSA has reported that over 90% of businesses in England, NI, and Wales agreed that having a good rating is attractive to customers as it shows them that the business takes food hygiene seriously and helps inform them about the business’s hygiene standards.

However, a low rating can damage your reputation and lead to a loss of customers. Research shows that 64% of customers consider cleanliness when choosing where to eat, with 82% stating they would avoid restaurants or takeaways with a hygiene rating of two or below.

The cost of foodborne disease: food for thought

Foodborne disease is a risk that food businesses take when food hygiene is not prioritised. Not only can foodborne disease have a severe impact on consumers, with 1 in 9 people falling ill each year from contaminated food, it can damage the economy too.

2026 FSA research shows that Campylobacter alone has an estimated societal and economic cost burden of £716M, whilst Salmonella has an estimated burden of £212M. In 2021 alone, the WHO estimated that productivity loss totalled US$310 billion for all countries combined.

A key takeaway

According to our data, 1 in 5 takeaways in England, Wales and NI have a hygiene rating of 3 or lower, although this rises to an incredible 47% in some cities. Compare this to only 11% of restaurants and 4% of hotels, and you can see that many takeaways drastically need to improve their standards.

Achieving and maintaining a top rating of 5 requires a consistent and proactive approach. Make sure you understand the FHRS framework, avoid these 10 most common food hygiene inspection mistakes and implement consistent best practice to ensure long-term success.

Whether you’re aiming to maintain a 5 or improve your current rating, our EHO approved Free Food Hygiene Rating Scheme Resource Pack is a practical guide designed to help you navigate the scheme and your inspection with expert tips and insight. It includes a wide range of resources and advice on practices that you can easily implement across your business to ensure long-term compliance and success. Alternatively, explore our range of CPD certified, RoSPA approved, and City & Guilds assured Food Hygiene Courses, endorsed by the Institute of Hospitality.

Methodology

Data was downloaded in June 2026 from the official Food Standards Agency 'UK food hygiene rating data API' which details the overall food hygiene ratings, rating components, and inspection results of food establishments across the UK.

The Food Standards Agency data attributes each establishment with one of fourteen business types. Of these business types, four were selected for inclusion. These were:

  • Restaurants/Cafes/Canteens
  • Takeaways/Sandwich Shops
  • Pubs/Bars/Nightclubs
  • Hotels/Bed & Breakfasts/Guest Houses

After filtering, if a business did not have a current rating or an inspection result then the entry was omitted from the analysis.

This resulted in a filtered total of businesses, equalling 239,562 establishments that fell within these categories and which were then used for the overall ranking analysis.

The regions selected for analysis in this report are the same twelve regions as used by the Food Standards Agency, and so businesses were split according to the region associated with their business.

The cities and towns being compared were selected from records held by the Office for National Statistics and the National Archives.

To match the food hygiene ratings provided for businesses by the Food Standards Agency we performed postcode lookups through the use of an online database, allowing us to match the postcodes of businesses with their closest major city or town, and the major city or town with their region. If a business did not have a valid postcode, then the entry was omitted from our analysis.

Following this, we amalgamated the food hygiene ratings of each town and city to provide an aggregate rating of food hygiene ratings for an area.

Following the data download, and after cities and towns were matched to rated businesses by postcode, several steps were taken to ensure the data was clean and fit for purpose.

In several instances, to ensure that the data was of interest to certain regions, the local authorities (as defined by the Food Standards Agency) of a region were used to split a region into further areas instead of using a city/town split. However, to provide clarity, in the overall rankings only cities and towns are listed.

As mentioned above, entries in the data downloaded from the Food Standards Agency without a valid postcode were omitted from analysis.

Following the cleaning of the data, several lists were created with cities/towns in each region ranked according to their mean food hygiene ratings and then subsequently ranked according to their overall rank in the UK - leading to the lists you are presented with here.

Food Standards Agency food hygiene ratings information, data and services are subject to the terms of the Open Government Licence (OGL).

The ratings are subject to change as they are regularly updated to reflect the standards found when a business is inspected by a local authority food safety officer.

Our study contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

High Speed Training would like to thank the Food Standards Agency and the Office for National Statistics.

For press and media enquires, please contact Dan Raymond, PR Manager at High Speed Training, at daniel.raymond@
highspeedtraining.co.uk

You can also Download the Press Pack